Case 1400843/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Ackrill v Barnstaple Stores Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400843/2019
- Decision date
- 15 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Ackrill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the time for presenting a response had expired and that no valid response had been presented. Judgment was therefore entered under Rule 21 by Employment Judge N J Roper at Exeter on 1 October 2019.
Mrs J Ackrill succeeded in her redundancy claim and was awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £10,150.14, calculated as 26 weeks at £390.39 gross per week. She also succeeded in her breach of contract claim in respect of her statutory notice period, with the respondent ordered to pay 12 weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £4,211.88.
The tribunal further found in the claimant's favour on unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of two weeks' pay in the gross sum of £780.78. Her claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay also succeeded, with an award of one week's pay in the gross sum of £390.39. The total of the sums awarded was £15,533.19.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded at 26 weeks x £390.39 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £10,150 |
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded in respect of the claimant's statutory notice period; 12 weeks' notice pay awarded net. | Upheld | — | £4,212 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded; respondent ordered to pay two weeks' pay gross. | Upheld | — | £781 |
| Holiday pay | Claim succeeded for accrued but unpaid holiday pay; one week's pay gross awarded. | Upheld | — | £390 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,533
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.