Case 1400845/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Step-Marsden of Counsel For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400845/2022
- Decision date
- 8 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms R Hewitt-Gray, Ms E Smillie
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms C Step-Marsden of Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in which the tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties. The judgment did not decide the merits of the claims; it adjourned the matter to allow the settlement terms to be implemented.
The tribunal stated that if neither party applied to relist the matter for hearing before 23 June 2023, the case would stand dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant as at that date. No findings of fact, liability conclusions, or remedy assessment are set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records a judgment by consent and states that terms of settlement had been agreed by the parties. The merits of the disability discrimination claim were not determined in this text. | Settled | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a judgment by consent and states that terms of settlement had been agreed by the parties. The merits of the unfair dismissal claim were not determined in this text. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.