Case 1400849/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Thomas v Pretty Bland Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400849/2022
- Decision date
- 4 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Southampton Employment Tribunals on 2 March 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 20 January 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that Miss S Thomas was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,102.63. It also found that Pretty Bland Ltd had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £285.00. The total awarded by the judgment was £1,387.63.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,102.63. | Upheld | — | £1,103 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £285.00. | Upheld | — | £285 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,388
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.