Case 1400850/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Witts v Martindales Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400850/2023
- Decision date
- 27 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hastie Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Witts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Witts worked for Martindales Ltd as a window fitter and surveyor from 1 May 2022 and resigned on 22 November 2022, with his last working day on 28 November 2022. At the hearing he withdrew the unpaid holiday pay and unpaid notice pay claims after those matters had been settled, and the tribunal dismissed them on withdrawal.
The remaining issue was whether the respondent was entitled to make 12 deductions from the claimant's final pay, totalling £1,013.55. The tribunal considered the April 2022 'Deductions from Wages' form and 'Van Checks' form, together with the evidence about the return of the van, keys, depot locks, and the condition of the vehicle and equipment after the claimant left.
The tribunal upheld the deductions for the replacement van key, replacement padlock, Dallas key, replacement depot locks, van deep clean, compensation for the sideboard, and recruitment costs. It found, in summary, that the claimant was not negligent in relation to the keys or depot locks, that the state of the van was not shown to have been caused by his negligence, that there was no evidence he caused the sideboard damage, and that there was no factual basis or evidence of what recruitment checks were charged or how they were quantified.
The tribunal dismissed the deductions for missing stepladders, missing Hoover, missing transformer, damaged wing mirror, and incorrectly measured glazed unit. It accepted the respondent's evidence on those items, including the weekly checklist and the evidence that the claimant was responsible for the measuring error. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £606.82.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Withdrawn at the hearing after the parties had settled this claim; the tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Withdrawn at the hearing after the parties had settled this claim; the tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Partially upheld. The tribunal found unlawful deductions for the replacement van key, replacement padlock, Dallas key, replacement depot locks, van deep clean, compensation for the sideboard, and recruitment costs, but dismissed the claims for missing stepladders, missing Hoover, missing transformer, damaged wing mirror, and incorrectly measured glazed unit. | Upheld | — | £607 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £607
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.