Case 1400861/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Constance Nyaguwa v Mr Joss Ackland — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400861/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lowe PRELIMINARY
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Constance Nyaguwa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Exeter on 29 June 2021, Employment Judge Lowe considered case numbers 1400861/2020 and 1404304/2020. The order records that the family household exemption in regulation 57(3) of the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015 was established.
The order did not determine any monetary award or finally dispose of the underlying dispute. It directed that the matter be listed for a telephone case management hearing at the first available date seven days after receipt of the order, and noted that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal recorded that the family household exemption in Reg.57(3) of the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015 was established, and it directed the matter to a telephone case management hearing. No final liability or monetary award was determined in this order. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Reg.57(3) National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.