In Person For the v Angus Gloag — 2021

Case reference: 1400866/2021
Decision date: 23 November 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Lowe Appearances

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

In Person For the

Respondent

Angus Gloag

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Miss H French brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Adam’s Gas Limited. The case was heard at Exeter by Cloud Video Platform on 26 October 2021 before Employment Judge Lowe. The written judgment records that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Angus Gloag.

The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim. The record does not set out the substantive reasons for that dismissal in writing. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.

The judgment also records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the decision being sent. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The written record states only that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would not be provided unless requested.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.