Case 1400869/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Robert Edgar v Versant Developments & Homes Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400869/2022
- Decision date
- 13 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
- Venue
- Bristol ET via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Robert Edgar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 2 September 2022 before Employment Judge G. King, the respondent did not attend. The tribunal found all six complaints advanced by Robert Edgar well founded and ordered payment of the sums identified in the judgment.
The tribunal awarded £2,251.63 for unpaid pension contributions, £126.67 for unpaid expenses, and £1,209.27 for unpaid car allowance. It also found the claim for statutory redundancy pay well founded and awarded £3,264.00.
The breach of contract complaint in respect of notice pay was upheld and £5,625.00 was ordered, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. The complaint for unpaid holiday was also upheld, with £4,326.93 awarded. The total due to the claimant was recorded as £16,803.50, with £5,625.00 subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint in respect of unpaid pension contributions; held well founded. | Upheld | — | £2,252 |
| Other | Complaint in respect of unpaid expenses; held well founded. | Upheld | — | £127 |
| Other | Complaint in respect of unpaid car allowance; held well founded. | Upheld | — | £1,209 |
| Redundancy | Complaint in respect of statutory redundancy pay; held well founded. | Upheld | — | £3,264 |
| Breach of contract | Complaint of breach of contract in respect of notice pay; awarded subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £5,625 |
| Holiday pay | Complaint in respect of unpaid holiday; held well founded. | Upheld | — | £4,327 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,804
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.