Case 1400871/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Smith v Dennis and Robinson Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400871/2021
- Decision date
- 29 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray MEMBERS
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr Spry-Shute, Mr Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Southampton on 12 to 14 December 2022 before Employment Judge Gray with lay members Mr Spry-Shute and Mr Evans. The Claimant, Mr S Smith, was represented by his brother-in-law and the Respondent, Dennis & Robinson Limited, was represented by counsel.
In its unanimous judgment, the tribunal dismissed the Claimant’s complaints of unfair dismissal and direct age discrimination. The written record does not set out the tribunal’s reasons, and it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
No remedy was awarded and no monetary figures are recorded in the judgment. The written decision was sent to the parties on 29 December 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment records this as a complaint of direct age discrimination. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.