Case 1400891/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bhaimia v Functional Safety Engineering Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400891/2021
- Decision date
- 21 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bhaimia
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Dawson recorded that the respondent, Functional Safety Engineering Services Limited, had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £4,333.33 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £4,666.67 for that claim. The judgment records no separate award breakdown beyond those two sums, and the overall total on the face of the decision is £9,000.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,333 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the sum stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,667 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.