Case 1400892/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hussey v Air Liquide (Home Care) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400892/2020
- Decision date
- 1 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hussey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote public hearing before Employment Judge Rayner, the tribunal found that Mr Hussey was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the material times by reason of a right shoulder impairment with osteoarthritis. That was the only positive disability finding recorded in the extracted judgment text.
The tribunal also found that Mr Hussey was not disabled by reason of depression and anxiety at the material times, and was not disabled by reason of arthritis at the material times. The extracted record contains no further findings on liability or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary disability-status ruling only. The extracted judgment records that the claimant was disabled by reason of a right shoulder impairment with osteoarthritis, but not by reason of depression and anxiety or arthritis. It does not record a substantive liability or remedy outcome. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.