Case 1400897/2020 · Employment Tribunal
X (1) and Y (2) v Catch22 Multi Academies Trust Ltd and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400897/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
X (1) and Y (2)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 24 June 2020, the Claimants withdrew all complaints against the Second Respondent. The written judgment records that the Second Respondent was therefore dismissed from the proceedings. The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action for those withdrawn complaints.
The Second Claimant also withdrew her complaints of indirect discrimination on grounds of sex at the same hearing. Those complaints were dismissed on withdrawal. The written record states that the Claimants’ other complaints continued, so the judgment is limited to these procedural disposals and does not determine the merits of the remaining claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that all complaints against the Second Respondent were withdrawn orally at the hearing on 24 June 2020 and that the Second Respondent was dismissed from the proceedings. The underlying causes of action are not specified in the written record. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The Second Claimant withdrew her complaints of indirect discrimination on grounds of sex orally at the hearing on 24 June 2020, and those complaints were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.