Case 1400899/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Pettitt v Luna 3-6-5 Healthcare Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400899/2022
- Decision date
- 4 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray-Jones Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Pettitt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not present a response, so the Tribunal entered a liability judgment for the Claimant under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013. The Tribunal then dealt with the pleaded claims on the basis of the written record.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The Tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction because the Claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service to bring an unfair dismissal claim at the date her employment ended. It also found that her employment had not terminated when the claim was presented.
The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £842.08 gross. The Claimant was also allowed to amend her claim to pursue holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 in respect of accrued and outstanding leave on termination.
The holiday pay claim succeeded because the Respondent had not paid the Claimant her entitlement to accrued annual leave. The Tribunal ordered £382.06 gross for that claim. The total award was £1,224.14.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction because the Claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service and her employment had not terminated when the claim was presented. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded and ordered payment of £842.08 gross. | Upheld | — | £842 |
| Holiday pay | The Claimant was permitted to amend to a Working Time Regulations 1998 holiday pay claim for accrued but outstanding leave on termination, and the Tribunal found the Respondent had not paid that entitlement. | Upheld | — | £382 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,224
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.