Case 1400900/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mark Hunt v Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Authority — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400900/2019
- Decision date
- 7 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell
- Venue
- Exeter
- Panel members
- Ms R Clarke, Ms C Lloyd-Jennings
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mark Hunt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Hunt, a firefighter with 25 years' service, was dismissed on 23 November 2018 after Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Authority investigated a 2017 video posted from an account in his name showing his former partner H in bed, and then investigated wider allegations arising from their relationship. The tribunal anonymised H, her son M, and the non-party witnesses Q and K, and noted that the case concerned conduct in Mr Hunt's private life rather than events at work.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal held that the Service had placed undue weight on Mr Hunt's failure to report police involvement. It found that the complaints policy was directed to complaints about the Service, that matters amounting to criminal conduct were to be referred to police, and that the disciplinary policy did not make failure to report a police investigation itself gross misconduct. The tribunal concluded that these private-life events were not relevant 'conduct' for the purposes of s.98 ERA 1996, that dismissal was outside the range of reasonable responses, and that the process was unfair in any event because of the long delay, the prolonged suspension, the vague and shifting allegations, the uneven treatment of the parties' accounts, and the failure to interview some relevant witnesses. It also said the case would have justified the maximum 25% uplift for non-compliance with the ACAS Code, but no remedy was determined in this liability judgment.
The tribunal also upheld direct discrimination on grounds of sex under section 13 Equality Act 2010. It found sufficient 'something more' beyond sex and dismissal to engage the burden of proof, including the different treatment of Mr Hunt's and H's accounts, the failure to probe obvious inconsistencies in H's evidence, and the way the investigation and disciplinary allegations were framed from the outset as domestic abuse and coercive control. The tribunal said that approach was not gender-neutral and reflected stereotypical assumptions about male and female roles in domestic abuse cases, so Mr Hunt was treated less favourably than a female firefighter in the same circumstances would have been treated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
12 references- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- paragraph 136 Equality Act 2010
- Articles 8 and 10 ECHR
- ACAS Code of Practice
- Thomson v Alloa Motor Company Ltd
- Pay v Lancashire Probation Service
- CJD v Royal Bank of Scotland
- Madarrassy v Nomura
- Efobi v Royal Mail Group
- Turner v West Midland Trains Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.