Case 1400901/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Clemo v Geeves Mastermind Club Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400901/2023
- Decision date
- 13 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Clemo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 22 February 2023. The Respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and made a determination on the papers.
The tribunal found that Geeves Mastermind Club Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Miss N Clemo's wages. It ordered the Respondent to pay £4,049.10 gross.
The judgment records the same figure as the amount payable in total, so no separate breakdown of remedy components was given beyond the wages deduction award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the Respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment states the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and must pay £4,049.10 gross. | Upheld | — | £4,049 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,049
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.