Case 1400904/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Pidgeon v Trowbridge Sports Bar Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400904/2020
- Decision date
- 25 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Pidgeon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a replacement judgment: the earlier judgment dated 26 March 2020 was revoked under rule 70 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 and replaced by the decision issued on 9 November 2020. The hearing was before Employment Judge Livesey, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by a solicitor.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,114. It also upheld the claim that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,003.16.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,114. In addition, because the respondent had failed to provide written terms and conditions of employment, the claimant was entitled to four weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, assessed at £1,114.
The judgment also records a declaration that the claimant had not been provided with itemised pay statements. No separate monetary figure is attached to that declaration in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,114. | Upheld | — | £1,114 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and was awarded damages of £1,003.16. | Upheld | — | £1,003 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,114. | Upheld | — | £1,114 |
| Other | The claimant was awarded four weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because the respondent had failed to provide written terms and conditions of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,114 |
| Other | The tribunal declared that the claimant had not been provided with itemised pay statements. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,345
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.