Case 1400913/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Fry Claire Maidment v MHA Burleigh Poole (OPCO) Limited (In Administration) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400913/2024
- Decision date
- 7 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss M Fry Claire Maidment
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 17 September 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out on the ground that they had not been actively pursued. The extracted judgment records that the claimants did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claims. The judgment does not set out any substantive determination of the underlying complaints, and it records no monetary award or other remedy. It was approved by Employment Judge Gray on 2 October 2025 and sent to the parties on 7 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the underlying causes of action; it states only that 'the claims' were struck out because they had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.