Case 1400917/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Louis Nelhams v Bruce Wilson and 3 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400917/2019
- Decision date
- 18 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Louis Nelhams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton on 18 October 2019, Employment Judge Dawson recorded that judgment had previously been awarded on 4 June 2019 against the first and third respondents. The written judgment orders those respondents to pay the claimant £1,657.75 for non-payment of wages and £2,032 for their non-provision of a written statement of employment particulars.
The judgment also states that the claims against the second and fourth respondents are dismissed. No lay members are listed, the claimant appeared in person, and there was no attendance for the respondents. The total amount ordered by the judgment is £3,689.75.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded against the first and third respondents for non-payment of wages. The judgment records that claims against the second and fourth respondents were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £1,658 |
| Other | Awarded against the first and third respondents for non-provision of a written statement of employment particulars. The judgment records that claims against the second and fourth respondents were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £2,032 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,690
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.