Case 1400920/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Twenty-Four Seven Recruitment Services Ltd and Tempay Ltd - In Voluntary Liquidation — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400920/2015
- Decision date
- 27 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis 27 February 2023 judgment by Employment Judge Livesey concerns the joined claims of Mr Camilo Dias, Mr Manoel Dias, Mrs Silvia Menezes and the Group D claimants against Twenty-Four Seven Recruitment Services Ltd and Tempay Ltd (in voluntary liquidation). The judgment records that the above claims are dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agency worker regulations | The judgment records that the above claims were dismissed as a result of the tribunal's judgments of 23 July 2021 and 22 December 2022; it does not restate the underlying reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the above claims were dismissed as a result of the tribunal's judgments of 23 July 2021 and 22 December 2022; it does not restate the underlying reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the above claims were dismissed as a result of the tribunal's judgments of 23 July 2021 and 22 December 2022; it does not restate the underlying reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.