Case 1400932/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Chant v Porton Biopharma Ltd PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400932/2020
- Decision date
- 12 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Chant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on whether Mr W Chant had a disability for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal accepted that he had a physical impairment, described as hypertension and high blood pressure, and noted that he had first been diagnosed with a cardiovascular disorder in December 2016 and had been prescribed medication to manage it.
The tribunal found that, when the condition became acute, it had a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. It relied on evidence that Mr Chant experienced chest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue and blurred vision, which affected his ability to walk even short distances and to focus and concentrate. The tribunal also noted that treatment had to be disregarded when assessing the effect of the impairment, and that without medication the symptoms would have been more acute.
On the long-term element, the tribunal found that the condition had persisted since 2016, with fluctuating but recurring acute episodes in June to October 2017, February 2019 to October 2019, and earlier symptoms in late 2018. It held that the adverse effects had lasted at least 12 months and were therefore long-term for the purposes of section 6 and Schedule 1 of the Act.
The tribunal concluded that Mr Chant was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material times for the claim, namely between February and November 2019. No remedy was assessed because the hearing determined only the preliminary disability issue.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found the claimant was disabled within s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the material times between February and November 2019. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1, paragraph 2 EQA 2010
- Schedule 1, paragraph 5 EQA 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office four questions
- McNicol v Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance Ltd
- Aderimi v London and South Eastern Railway Ltd
- Igweike v TSB Bank Plc
- EHRC Guidance on disability
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.