Case 1400959/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bagnato v Cucina Commercial Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400959/2021
- Decision date
- 18 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Bagnato
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 25 February 2021 and was determined under rule 21 because the respondent did not dispute the claim. Employment Judge Rayner Date dealt with the matter on the papers and entered judgment for the claimant.
The tribunal found that Mr J Bagnato had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded him damages of £1,598.00 for that breach.
The tribunal also found that Cucina Commercial Ltd had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It awarded £1,200.00 in relation to that claim. The total award was £2,798.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,598.00. | Upheld | — | £1,598 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £1,200.00. The judgment does not give further detail, so this is classified as holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,798
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.