Case 1400964/2019 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v - Ms L Williams — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400964/2019
- Decision date
- 28 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing held in Bristol by CVP conference on 28 May 2020, Employment Judge Mr P Cadney sat alone and gave judgment in the case brought by Mr B Kamanga against Woodland Manor Care Home (R1) and Driskal Ltd (in administration) (R2). The claimant appeared in person and Ms L Williams appeared for the respondent.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s claims against Woodland Manor Care Home (R1). It also dismissed the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim against both R1 and R2. The judgment does not set out the underlying factual findings or any legal test for those dismissals.
The judgment records that the claimant’s remaining claims were to proceed to hearing in accordance with the case management directions. No monetary remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses the claimant’s claims against Woodland Manor Care Home (R1), but it does not identify the underlying causes of action in this limb. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant’s unfair dismissal claim against both R1 and R2 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.