Case 1400969/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Reddaway and 19 others (see Schedule attached) v Dunbia (UK) t/a Dunbia West Devon — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400969/2020
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Reddaway and 19 others (see Schedule attached)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNine claimants named in the judgment - Adam Moore, Darren Harvey, Darren Trewin, Gary Walker, Joe Wall, Mark Kilsby, Steven James Hall, Bryan Pitts and Christopher Leahy - had withdrawn their claims in writing by correspondence dated 10 November 2020 and confirmed that withdrawal orally at the hearing on 11 November 2020. The tribunal recorded that those claims were dismissed on withdrawal.
This is a short procedural judgment and it does not determine the merits of the underlying claims or any remedy. The schedule attached to the decision shows that 11 claimants' claims continued. The record also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Nine named claimants withdrew their claims in writing dated 10 November 2020 and confirmed the withdrawal orally at the hearing on 11 November 2020; the tribunal recorded that those claims were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.