Case 1400982/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Mr A Davies v Pbs4 — 2023

Case reference: 1400982/2023
Decision date: 18 October 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ferguson Representation
Venue: Bristol

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A Davies

Respondent

Pbs4

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Mr A Davies brought complaints against PBS4 at Bristol Employment Tribunal, heard by video on 15 September 2023 before Employment Judge Ferguson. The judgment records two wage-related complaints, but only the complaint about alleged unauthorised deductions from wages for work carried out during sleep-in shifts was decided in this document.

That sleep-in-shift complaint was dismissed. The judgment does not set out detailed written reasons, stating that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The separate complaint about a deduction from the Claimant's final payment said to relate to an overpayment of holiday pay was not determined in this judgment and was instead made subject to case management orders in a separate document dated the same day.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Complaint relating to work carried out during sleep-in shifts. The separate complaint about a deduction from final pay said to arise from overpaid holiday pay was not finally determined in this judgment and was dealt with by case management orders in a separate document of the same date.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.