Case 1400989/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Chruchill v Holroyd Howe Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400989/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Chruchill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 26 April 2021 the Employment Tribunal wrote to the claimant, Mrs R Chruchill, saying that Employment Judge Roper was considering striking out the claim because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 14 April 2021 and because it appeared that the claim was not being actively pursued.
The claimant was given the opportunity to object or to request a hearing at which submissions could be made. She did not make any representations in writing or otherwise and did not request a hearing.
Regional Employment Judge Pirani therefore struck out the claim. The judgment contains no findings on the merits of any substantive complaint and no award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only records that 'the claim' was struck out. It does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action, so the substantive claim type cannot be extracted from this text alone. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.