Case 1401003/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Mead v AND Carter Technical Mouldings Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401003/2023
- Decision date
- 25 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Mead
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was decided under rule 21 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. Employment Judge N J Roper sat in chambers at Plymouth on 4 October 2023 and entered judgment for the claimant, Mr D Mead, against Carter Technical Mouldings Limited.
The tribunal found that Mr Mead had been unfairly dismissed and that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. It also upheld his claim for breach of contract in respect of notice pay. Those findings are stated in the judgment without further factual explanation in the extracted text.
The tribunal further held that the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded, as did his claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. The judgment records that the appropriate remedy would be determined at a further hearing, and no monetary award is set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.