Case 1401026/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bromige, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401026/2020
- Decision date
- 23 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Richardson Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr J Bromige, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 18 March 2021, Employment Judge A Richardson determined that the claimant's conditions, referred to collectively as Post Sepsis Syndrome, satisfied the definition of disability under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The written record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal held that the claimant's conditions, referred to collectively as Post Sepsis Syndrome, satisfied the definition of disability under s.6 Equality Act 2010. No substantive liability or remedy was determined in this record. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.