Case 1401026/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Haq v Shire Oak Energy Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401026/2023
- Decision date
- 7 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Haq
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 7 March 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Rayner decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claimant had suffered an unlawful deduction from pay of £6,746.34 gross in respect of unpaid wages for the period from 1 June 2022 to 23 December 2022. It also found that the claimant had been wrongfully dismissed and was entitled to £3,503.57 net in notice pay, stated as 4 weeks (1 month).
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay those two sums. It recorded that all other claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages from 1 June 2022 to 23 December 2022; award stated as £6,746.34 gross. | Upheld | — | £6,746 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Notice pay awarded at £3,503.57 net for 4 weeks (1 month). | Upheld | — | £3,504 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,250
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.