Case 1401034/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Qureshi in person For the v Mr Gill in person supported by his daughter Ms Harpreet Gill Mr Saqib Aqeel, Punjabi interpreter, assisted Mr Gill — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401034/2021
- Decision date
- 8 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hogarth Appearances
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Qureshi in person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis one-page judgment records a preliminary or case-management decision rather than a final merits outcome. The tribunal found that Mr Zakir Qureshi was an employee of Mr Jagmohan Singh Gill when working at Colerne Stores, 8A Market Place, Colerne, Wiltshire SN14 8DF.
The judgment then states that the final hearing would be listed for two days before a Judge sitting alone. It also records that a Punjabi interpreter would be required.
No substantive liability decision, dismissal outcome, or remedy award is recorded in the extracted text. The note at the end states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending the record of decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not record a substantive merits decision on a specific claim. It records only that the claimant was an employee of the respondent when working at Colerne Stores, and that the final hearing would be listed for two days. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.