Case 1401036/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Upton (Claimant’s Father) For the v Miss S Hunter (Director) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401036/2019
- Decision date
- 3 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emerton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Upton (Claimant’s Father) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Emerton, sitting alone at Southampton, found that Mr L Upton's claim for holiday pay outstanding at termination was well founded. The judgment records no other substantive claims or liabilities beyond this holiday pay issue.
The respondent, Tedroo Limited (t/a Acapulco Bar & Eatery), was ordered to pay the claimant £945.59 gross. The judgment states that the sum may be liable for lawful deductions for tax and national insurance. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the claimant's claim for holiday pay outstanding at termination was well founded and ordered payment of £945.59 gross, subject to lawful deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £946 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £946
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £946
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.