Case 1401036/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Whiteway v 2 Sisters Food Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401036/2020
- Decision date
- 16 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Whiteway
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, referring to orders 8 and 9 of the Case Management Orders dated 2 September 2020.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim for not being actively pursued, and the hearing listed for 1 and 2 March 2021 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The unfair dismissal classification follows the case listing category rather than detailed particulars in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The whistleblowing classification follows the public interest disclosure listing category rather than detailed particulars in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.