Case 1401044/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J McCall v The Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Constabulary — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401044/2020
- Decision date
- 6 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J McCall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on whether the claimant was disabled within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 during the period from 12 September 2018 to 11 November 2019. The tribunal did not determine liability for the pleaded disability discrimination claim at this stage.
The tribunal found, from GP records, occupational health records, the claimant’s evidence, and Dr Campbell’s evidence, that the claimant had a mental impairment at the relevant times. Although there was no formal specialist diagnosis, the tribunal was satisfied that the claimant’s condition involved anxiety, depression, stress-related symptoms, and likely PTSD, and that these were more than reactions to adverse life events alone.
The tribunal found adverse effects on normal day-to-day activities including severely impaired sleep, affected appetite and difficulty eating, becoming overwhelmed and losing control of thoughts and emotions, and flashbacks or freezing when exposed to triggers in everyday settings such as hearing a child scream or walking in the local area. Those effects were more than minor or trivial.
On duration, the tribunal found that the claimant had experienced these effects since at least spring 2015, with fluctuating symptoms continuing well beyond 12 months. It therefore concluded that the long-term requirement was met and held that the claimant was disabled for Equality Act purposes throughout the relevant period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | This reserved judgment determined only the preliminary issue of disability status under s.6 Equality Act 2010 for the period 12 September 2018 to 11 November 2019. The merits of the disability discrimination claim were not adjudicated in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Sullivan v Bury Street Capital Limited four-stage approach
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- McNicol v Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance Ltd
- Schedule 1 EqA 2010 substantial adverse effect provisions
- SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle
- McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.