Case 1401048/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Representing himself For the v Representing himself — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401048/2020
- Decision date
- 11 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lowe Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Representing himself For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mr W Pithers' claim of unfair dismissal against WT Hotels Limited. It assessed compensation at a basic award of £769.23 gross and a compensatory award of £230.77 gross, making a gross total of £1,000.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's breach of contract claim and awarded damages of £230.77 gross. The judgment records that this sum was deducted from the unfair dismissal award so that it was not double counted, and the overall total remained £1,000 gross subject to deductions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim and calculated a basic award of £769.23 and a compensatory award of £230.77, giving a total award of £1,000 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
| Breach of contract | Damages of £230.77 gross were awarded, but the judgment states that this sum was deducted from the unfair dismissal claim so it was not double counted. | Upheld | — | £231 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £769
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £231
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.