Case 1401057/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Moorcroft v Mr J Stephens and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401057/2023
- Decision date
- 22 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Moorcroft
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Livesey. The tribunal determined the claim on the papers and entered judgment for the claimant against both respondents on all three pleaded heads of claim.
The tribunal found that the respondents had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,078.41 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, awarding damages of £541.28 net.
The tribunal further found that the respondents had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £368.00. The combined monetary awards totalled £1,987.69.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,078.41. | Upheld | — | £1,078 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered payment of damages in the net sum of £541.28. | Upheld | — | £541 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondents failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £368.00. | Upheld | — | £368 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,988
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.