Case 1401060/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Niciejewska v AND Unite Telecoms Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401060/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Niciejewska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim in chambers on 27 April 2022 under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. In those circumstances, the tribunal entered judgment without a contested hearing. The hearing listed for 3 February 2023 was cancelled.
The claimant's breach of contract claim succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay two weeks' notice pay of £958.00. The claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim also succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of £2,401.10 gross, made up of unpaid wages of £1,916.00, unpaid NEST contributions of £275.39, and unpaid pension contributions of £209.55.
The claimant's claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded as well, and the respondent was ordered to pay £422.00 gross. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment was £3,781.10.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded for two weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £958 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded in the gross sum of £2,401.10, consisting of unpaid wages of £1,916.00, unpaid NEST contributions of £275.39, and unpaid pension contributions of £209.55. | Upheld | — | £2,401 |
| Holiday pay | Claim succeeded for accrued but unpaid holiday pay in the gross sum of £422.00. | Upheld | — | £422 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,781
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.