Case 1401060/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v On The Go Traffic Management Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1401060/2023
- Decision date
- 1 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr C Thompson, presented his claim in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 7 March 2023. The respondent, On The Go Traffic Management Limited, failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The amount awarded was £525 gross, calculated by reference to three and a half shifts which the claimant said he had worked on the ET1 claim form, multiplied by £150 per shift.
The judgment records that the claimant is responsible for accounting for any tax payable on the sum, and that payment must be made within 14 days of the date the judgment was sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge made a rule 22 determination on the papers. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and calculated the sum due by reference to three and a half shifts at £150 per shift. | Upheld | — | £525 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £525
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.