Case 1401068/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Eves v South Western Ambulance Service NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401068/2021
- Decision date
- 25 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Eves
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing an in-person preliminary hearing on 25 January 2022, Employment Judge Livesey ordered the claimant to pay deposits in respect of the listed complaints: £200 for the s.19 complaint about the 2020 job application, £600 for the s.20 complaints described in the reasons, and £2,600 for the s.27 complaints. The order was sent to the claimant on 26 January 2022.
The claimant did not pay the deposits. The tribunal therefore struck out the claims, and the hearing listed for 30 and 31 August 2022 and 1 September 2022 did not take place. The judgment does not record any merits findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | s.19 complaint in relation to the 2020 job application; deposit of £200 ordered at the preliminary hearing. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The s.20 complaints described as three complaints in relation to the 2020 job application and the two in 2015; deposit of £600 ordered. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The 13 s.27 complaints; deposit of £2,600 ordered. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.