Case 1401068/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Wilkie v Heartbreakers Ltd Mr T Dyer, C/O Psychedelia Ltd and Psychedelia Ltd. — 2026
- Case reference
- 1401068/2023
- Decision date
- 6 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Wilkie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the matter at Southampton by video on 6 March 2026 before Employment Judge Gray. Neither the Claimant nor the Respondents attended or were represented at the hearing.
The Tribunal dismissed the Claimant's claim pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024, having considered the information available to it. The written judgment records that oral reasons were given and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the Claimant's claim under Rule 47 after both parties failed to attend or be represented. The judgment does not give written reasons or a claim-specific analysis. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment dismisses the Claimant's claim under Rule 47 after both parties failed to attend or be represented. The judgment does not give written reasons or a claim-specific analysis. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The gov.uk listing includes Written Pay Statement. The judgment itself provides no further claim-specific detail and dismisses the claim under Rule 47. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.