Case 1401076/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Oldham v Practical Recruitment Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401076/2021
- Decision date
- 1 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Oldham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under rule 21 because Practical Recruitment Ltd failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore proceeded to determine the claim in the respondent's absence.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. On that basis, it ordered the respondent to pay Mr D Oldham the gross sum of £1,363.00. No separate breakdown of the award was given in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Default judgment under rule 21. The extracted text states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and must pay £1,363 gross. The dates in the text appear inconsistent: it says the claim was issued on 10 March 2022, while the judgment is dated 28 January 2022. | Upheld | — | £1,363 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,363
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.