Case 1401086/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Nicholls v Veltopia Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401086/2022
- Decision date
- 23 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leverton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Nicholls
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant had been employed from July or August 2020 as a manager in the respondent's vape shop. The tribunal found that on 3 January 2022 he was told the shop was going to close and that he would be made redundant, and that he did not resign. Because he had been employed for less than two years, his statutory notice entitlement was one week. The tribunal found he had been given more than a week's notice, his employment ended on 15 January 2022, and he was not entitled to any further notice payment, so that claim was dismissed.
The tribunal accepted that, at the date of the claim, the claimant was owed £400 wages for January 2022 and £188 for 2.8 days' unused statutory holiday. It granted a declaration that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of those sums, but recorded that the outstanding wages and holiday pay had been paid before the hearing. Because the sums had been paid and the claimant sought no further recovery under those heads, no monetary compensation was awarded for wages or holiday pay.
On payslips, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide written itemised pay statements during the employment, apart from one payslip in 2020. It granted a declaration under section 8 ERA 1996, but made no compensation award because the payslips for December 2021 and January 2022 did not show any unnotified deductions in the relevant 13-week period before the claim. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars when proceedings began.
Because the claimant succeeded on the claims that engaged section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, the tribunal made the minimum award of two weeks' pay under that provision. Using the weekly rate in the claimant's schedule of loss, £407.50, it awarded £815. It declined the higher four-week award because the respondent was a small employer and a written contract had since been provided.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. The tribunal found the claimant had been given more than one week's notice, was not contractually entitled to a longer period, and was not entitled to a payment in lieu. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Regulation 14 WTR claim for 2.8 days' accrued but untaken holiday pay. The tribunal found the sum was outstanding at the date of the claim and later recorded that it had been paid before the hearing, so no further monetary award was made. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Part II ERA claim for unpaid January 2022 wages. The tribunal found the wages were outstanding at the date of the claim and later recorded that they had been paid before the hearing, so no further monetary award was made. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Section 8 ERA 1996 claim for failure to provide written itemised pay statements. The tribunal granted a declaration that the respondent failed to provide payslips at or before payment dates, but made no compensation award because there were no unnotified deductions in the relevant 13-week period. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Section 1(1) ERA 1996 claim for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. The tribunal awarded the minimum amount under section 38 Employment Act 2002, being two weeks' pay at £407.50 per week. | Upheld | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £815
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- Article 3, Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- section 86 ERA 1996
- regulation 14 WTR 1998
- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 8 ERA 1996
- section 12(3) and 12(4) ERA 1996
- section 24(1) ERA 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.