Case 1401111/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jack Rogers v AND Mr David Haigh — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401111/2021
- Decision date
- 10 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jack Rogers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat under Rule 21 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. It held that Mr David Haigh was the correct respondent to the proceedings and dismissed Lamorna Cove Limited as a respondent. The claimant’s claims for unfair dismissal, entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment, public interest disclosures, and failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment were all dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The remaining claims succeeded. The breach of contract claim succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay one week’s notice pay in the net sum of £248.36. The claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £1,625.80. The claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay also succeeded, with an order for 6.25 days’ pay in the gross sum of £229.16. The total monetary award was £2,103.32.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim described as being in relation to public interest disclosures; dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment; dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Succeeded for one week's notice pay, ordered as a net sum. | Upheld | — | £248 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded for the gross sum ordered by the tribunal. | Upheld | — | £1,626 |
| Holiday pay | Succeeded for 6.25 days' pay, ordered as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £229 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,103
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.