Case 1401121/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Short v Rad Mill Farm Shop Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1401121/2024
- Decision date
- 3 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pirani
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Short
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn the respondent's application, and after considering correspondence from the parties, the tribunal wrote to Mr T Short on 3 July 2025 under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 stating that Regional Employment Judge Pirani was considering striking out the claim because it was not being actively pursued. The letter gave Mr Short until 2.00 pm on 4 July 2025 to object, either by providing reasons or by requesting a hearing.
No reply was received from Mr Short. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying allegations and no monetary award was made.
The tribunal also recorded that the four-day hearing listed to commence on 7 July 2025 was vacated and would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action; it records only that the claim was struck out because it was not being actively pursued under rule 38 after no reply was received from the claimant. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.