Case 1401122/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A R Knowles v First for Safety Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1401122/2025
- Decision date
- 5 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A R Knowles
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and that permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to continue as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 05 July 2025 to obtain permission to proceed, and stated that if no notification was received the matter could be considered after six months and struck out. No notification was received from the claimant, and the claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim is struck out. The short judgment does not separately describe the underlying claims; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category supplied in the prompt. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claim is struck out. The short judgment does not separately describe the underlying claims; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category supplied in the prompt. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim is struck out. The short judgment does not separately describe the underlying claims; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category supplied in the prompt. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.