Case 1401125/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S v P Earle Marsh AND Alpha Appointments SW Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401125/2022
- Decision date
- 26 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe employment tribunal sat in chambers at Plymouth on 11 April 2022 and entered judgment under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The respondent was therefore not defending the claim, and the tribunal recorded judgment on the papers for the claims before it.
The claimant, Ms S P Earle Marsh, succeeded in her breach of contract claim. The tribunal ordered the respondent, Alpha Appointments SW Limited, to pay nine weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £4,042.00.
The claimant also succeeded in her unlawful deduction from wages claim. The tribunal ordered payment of £1,192.20 gross, comprising £1,060.00 for unpaid wages between 24 December 2021 and 4 January 2022 and £132.20 for unpaid Nest contributions. The claimant further succeeded in her claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay, with the tribunal ordering 5.6 weeks' pay in the gross sum of £3,024.00. The judgment was sent to the parties on 26 April 2022.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Succeeded under Rule 21; respondent ordered to pay nine weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £4,042.00. | Upheld | — | £4,042 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded under Rule 21; respondent ordered to pay £1,192.20 gross, made up of unpaid wages of £1,060.00 between 24 December 2021 and 4 January 2022 and unpaid Nest contributions of £132.20. | Upheld | — | £1,192 |
| Holiday pay | Succeeded under Rule 21; respondent ordered to pay 5.6 weeks' pay in the gross sum of £3,024.00 for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £3,024 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,258
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.