Case 1401129/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S C Euan Hernen v Batida Restaurant Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401129/2023
- Decision date
- 7 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Youngs Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S C Euan Hernen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol Employment Tribunal by video hearing on 15 September 2023 before Employment Judge Youngs. The Claimant, Mr S C Euan Hernen, appeared in person and the Respondent, Batida Restaurant Ltd, was represented by Mr J Tidy, consultant.
The tribunal held that the Claimant’s claim for unlawful deductions from wages in respect of holiday pay succeeded. No written reasons were provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing, unless either party requested written reasons within 14 days of the judgment being sent.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £1,394.57, subject to deductions for tax and employee National Insurance Contributions. No separate breakdown of the award is given in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim was for unlawful deductions from wages in respect of holiday pay and that it succeeded. | Upheld | — | £1,395 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,395
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.