Case 1401130/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Michael Fox v Equimedia Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401130/2021
- Decision date
- 4 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Halliday
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Ms Mayo, Ms Ramsaram
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Michael Fox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr Michael Fox's claim against Equimedia Limited at Bristol on 13, 14 and 15 December 2022 before Employment Judge Halliday with Ms Mayo and Ms Ramsaram sitting as members. The only claim recorded in the written judgment was an automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 100(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, based on the allegation that Mr Fox had raised health and safety concerns.
The tribunal held that the claim did not succeed and dismissed it. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing, but no written reasons were provided because none were requested within the time allowed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 100(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996 for raising health and safety concerns. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.100(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.