Case 1401145/2022 · Employment Tribunal
in person (accompanied by his partner) The v D J Smith — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401145/2022
- Decision date
- 15 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goraj Representation
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person (accompanied by his partner) The
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 9 September 2022 before Employment Judge Goraj at Exeter, the parties agreed terms of settlement for the claimant's holiday pay claim. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was awarded the agreed sum of £405, which the respondent paid at the conclusion of the hearing, and that this payment was made in full and final settlement of that claim.
The judgment also records that the claimant's other tribunal claims had previously been dismissed by the tribunal on 24 May 2022 following withdrawal by the claimant. No merits findings are set out in this short judgment for those other claims, and no further remedy was recorded in relation to them.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the parties agreed terms of settlement, and the respondent paid the agreed sum at the conclusion of the hearing in full and final settlement of the holiday pay claim. | Settled | — | £405 |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's other tribunal claims had previously been dismissed on 24 May 2022 following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £405
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.