Case 1401162/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Chapman v Southern Vectis Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401162/2023
- Decision date
- 26 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Chapman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Livesey recorded that by letter dated 28 July 2023 the Tribunal gave Mr R Chapman an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reason identified was that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 27 May 2023, following a reminder sent on 30 June 2023, and the Tribunal considered that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 27 September 2023 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim types in the extracted text. The claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 27 May 2023 and did not provide sufficient representations after the 28 July 2023 letter and reminder sent on 30 June 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.