Case 1401170/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Middleton plus 24 further Claimants as per the Schedule v R & M Utility & Civil Engineering South West Limited (In Voluntary Creditors Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1401170/2023
- Decision date
- 7 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Middleton plus 24 further Claimants as per the Schedule
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal granted the application to add Mr Malcolm Hewings as a claimant under case number 1401277/2024.
The Tribunal declared that the complaint that the Respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded. It made a protective award for the claimants listed in the schedule, who were employees at the Respondent's Unit 38D, Greendale Business Park premises and were dismissed as redundant with others on or after 24 November 2022.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the claimants remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 24 November 2022. The judgment records that reasons were given orally and no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal declared the complaint under section 188 of TULRCA well founded and made a protective award of 90 days' remuneration. No specific monetary amount was stated. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.