Case 1401175/2019 · Employment Tribunal
No appearance For the v Mr Clark (Consultant) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401175/2019
- Decision date
- 30 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No appearance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 30 August 2019 at Southampton, Employment Judge Rayner heard sworn evidence from Mrs Christine Blackledge for the respondent. The claimant did not appear. The tribunal recorded the respondent's admission that wages were owing in the sum of £613.17.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages in that amount and awarded £613.17. The claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had received a written contract of employment in the standard form contained in the respondent's bundle and was therefore not entitled to compensation under section 38 Employment Act 2002.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent admitted wages owing in the sum of £613.17, and the tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages in that amount. | Upheld | — | £613 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £613
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.