Case 1401176/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Merryn Turner v Westcountry Home Care Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401176/2021
- Decision date
- 24 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hughes
- Panel members
- Ms Rachael Hewitt-Gray, Mr Ian Ley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Merryn Turner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms Merryn Turner, brought claims against Westcountry Home Care Ltd for direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability. The case was heard at Bodmin via VHS on 14, 15 and 16 November 2022 before Employment Judge David Hughes sitting with Ms Rachael Hewitt-Gray and Mr Ian Ley.
In the judgment sent to the parties on 24 November 2022, the tribunal recorded that both the direct disability discrimination claim and the discrimination arising from disability claim were not well-founded. Both claims were dismissed.
The written record contains only the tribunal's operative decision and does not set out detailed reasons or any remedy assessment. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim; the tribunal found it was not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability claim; the tribunal found it was not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.